![]() ![]() And now every other video conferencing platform is offering a free tier including Microsoft Teams which was earlier a strictly paid-only service. The major reason Zoom found early success among both enterprises and general consumers goes primarily to its free plan offering. Nevertheless, at its current form, Microsoft Teams is not the best in terms of UI when pitted against Zoom and Google Meet. ![]() ![]() Only after the crazy success of Zoom, Microsoft merged Skype for Business with Teams to offer video meeting solution on its platform. Part of the reason why Microsoft Teams feels disjointed is that earlier it was a workspace for team collaboration through instant messaging - basically a Slack competitor. ![]() Sure, it’s brimming with features, but it would take you some time before you can find the option and start or join a video meeting. Moving to Microsoft Team, well, in my testing, I found it quite unfriendly. And similar to Zoom, Google Meet has also brought the popular Gallery view (called Tiled layout on Google Meet), but as of now, it only supports up to 16 users. You can also change the layout from the 3-dot menu. Further, on the meeting window, you have basic controls like Captions and Screen Sharing. On its dashboard, you are presented with only two options: either to join or start a meeting. In fact, many would consider it a barebone app, but that is part of its design approach to keep the UI as clean as possible. Coming to Google Meet, it’s second only to Zoom in terms of simplicity. Next, you can display up to 50 participants in a tiled-gallery view which is amazing. First off, creating or joining a meeting is just a click away. It has a simple and straight-forward interface despite being packed with the most advanced features. In terms of User Interface, I find Zoom to be the most user-friendly video conferencing app. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |